Photos of Nordhordland Biosphere Region (Top left, bottom left, and bottom right) and of Mount Elgon Biosphere Reserve (top right).
Photo Credit: Inger Måren (Top right, top left, and bottom right), and Rita Sæle Sangeland (bottom left).

By Alicia D. Barraclough, Maureen G. Reed, Kaera Coetzer, Martin F. Price, Lisen Schultz, Andrés Moreira-Muñoz, and Inger Måren.

Read the full paper here.

In our paper we look back at half a century of experiences and learnings drawn from The World Network of Biosphere Reserves (WNBR), of UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere Programme. The network is presently composed of 738 Biosphere Reserves in 134 countries. Biosphere Reserves try to go beyond just biodiversity conservation, by offering learning spaces for sustainable development, sustainable resource use and capacity building. Their spirit is captured in an old project slogan “Breaking the Glass: opening conservation to Man”, showing their intention to enact an integrated “people and nature” approach to conservation.

In our paper, we argue that there is much to learn from these sites, and that reflecting on these insights can help realize the future potential of the network, as well as inform other place-based sustainability efforts. From a review of the experiences in five continents over five decades, we offer six categories of insights:

1) Site-based sustainability networks need consistent institutional support for partners to collaborate across scales and sectors, with strong coordination of academic, governmental, and intergovernmental organizations; appropriate recognition for solution-seeking transdisciplinary research and action; and adequate resources and funding.

2) Projects and networks that involve different academic disciplines and diverse sectors raise additional challenges for long-term monitoring and data collection. They therefore require reliable research infrastructure and support.

3) Moving from knowledge to action in practical terms needs long-term knowledge partnerships where local and Indigenous peoples are responsibly and ethically engaged. This imperative raises important methodological challenges for sustainability scientists.

4) Multilateral initiatives must establish basic principles supported by legal and institutional frameworks whilst allowing flexibility at national and local levels. This interplay requires striking a balance between compliance monitoring and allowing experimentation and learning to address local sustainability agendas.

5) Bridging institutions such as Biosphere Reserves facilitate necessary conditions for adaptive governance and management across administrative and political boundaries. Bringing stakeholders together for collective action helps to increase the impact of local initiatives and have global impacts.

6) The biodiversity crisis cannot be addressed by Protected Areas alone; it also needs institutions to simultaneously address ecological issues and the often-conflicting jurisdictions of social and political processes. To address the biodiversity crisis we must continue to acknowledge and work with the people living within landscapes.